Based on the center’s results report, the center’s management team or dean’s office, coordinated by the person responsible for the center’s quality, prepares the Center Management Report (IGc), which includes:
- Analysis and reflection on the operation and actions carried out by the center in the following aspects: orientation of teaching to students, resources and services, linkage with the environment and training offer;
- Analysis and reflection on the quality policy and objectives: alignment with the UPV quality policy and definition and/or revision, if applicable, of the center’s quality objectives;
- Proposal of new improvement actions for the center, taking into account the analysis of the proposals for improvement actions for the degrees, follow-up of the improvements in progress and closure of the improvements already completed or cancelled.
- Overall assessment: main strengths and future vision of the center;
- Suggestions for improvement of the SIQ_UPV.
The analysis of the information makes it possible to assess both the maintenance and updating of the training offer, as well as the relevance and needs of resources and services;
The cQI is approved by the ERT through its collegiate bodies and submitted to the Quality Commission of the UPV for evaluation, after technical review. During the evaluation of the CQI, the Quality Commission may propose improvements to be included by the ERT, and identify among the implemented improvements those that can be considered good practices for having demonstrated their effectiveness for continuous improvement;
In order to ensure transparency, the cQI, once approved and evaluated by the Quality Commission of the UPV, is published on the corresponding web page of the center, as well as on the website of the area responsible for quality;
Report of results of center
Annually, the SIQ_UPV provides the centers with quantitative (indicators) and qualitative information (Pegasus Report, Employability Reports, poly[Consultation] report, poly[SQF] report) in the so-called Center Results Report. This includes:
Indicators of the center’s titles:
- Rate of return
- Efficiency rate
- Graduation rate
- Abandonment rate
- Rate of full-time teaching and research staff
- Rate of PDI doctor
- Enrollment rate
- Supply and demand rate
- Percentage of students who have completed an internship in a company
- Percentage of non-unemployed
- Average group size
- Cut-off score
- Average faculty satisfaction with the management of the degree program
- Average student satisfaction with the management of the degree program
- Average student satisfaction with the teaching provided in the degree program
- Average satisfaction of the graduate with the training received
- Average satisfaction of the graduate with the training received after three years of study
Center indicators:
Student indicators
- Graduate students
- Percentage of women enrolled
- Percentage of graduates with scholarships;
- Percentage of graduates who have carried out academic exchange
- Percentage of graduates who have completed external internships
- Supply/demand ratio of the center
- Demand of the center
- Gross enrollment rate
- Number of students admitted with respect to the number of places offered
- Cumulative dropout rate
- % credits taught in English
Stakeholder satisfaction indicators
- Average satisfaction of the teaching staff with the management of the degree
- Academic-administrative procedures at the Center’s secretariats
- Center Counseling: general information and other support tasks
- Management of internships
- Processing of exchange scholarship applications
- Computer classrooms at the Center: hardware and corporate software